Dear Mayor Romero & City Council Members

Mitchell Park is an historic resource (the City of San Luis Obispo’s Cultural Heritage Committee voted 7-0 against the parking lot) that must be preserved for future generations.

We urge that you recommend against the modification of the Mitchell Park Master Plan. It would be a mistake to use park land for parking instead of a garden as is currently listed in the Master Plan.

Thank you so much for seeking alternatives to the paving proposition that is being considered at the Mitchell Park Senior Center.

We consider it intrusive: The parking lot is larger than the building and introduces unpleasant elements of asphalt, cars, noise, and additional lighting in the green space. A trash container the size of a car is undesirable next to the main sidewalk into the park. That planned large BBQ area under the redwood trees takes another big bite out of the green space and would create a hangout that would not be easy to see from the street. The vision we prefer contains the activity area, with the BBQ in the currently underutilized horseshoe pit area behind the building, trash located conveniently nearby, surrounded by the community garden.

We consider it unintended: The land for this park was never meant for parking. This proposal is also in conflict with the Master Plan, which came about through much discussion over many years and favors a community sense of place.

We consider it inadequate: With a stated membership of over 300 and the huge baby-boomer population about to impact all senior services, what is really needed is a new location, a new facility, and extensive parking for those who insist upon driving instead of using an alternative means of transportation.

We consider it dangerous: You can imagine the traffic congestion since the proposed exit is adjacent to a children’s playground and a city bus stop. Bicycle loading would block the driveway, delaying exit (by designated users) which then creates further hazard at this busy intersection. The entrance on Buchon is equally problematic on this busy street.

The plan is to destroy trees and grass areas for a parking lot. We’re one of only 152 Tree Cities in the state of California (http://www.arborday.org/programs/treeCityUSA/map.cfm) . Twenty-four years ago, we were the 23rd city chosen. The demands of a few should not outweigh the needs of the many. Let’s save the park for future generations.

Once again, thank you for keeping an open mind and a long view while performing in your elected positions.

Regards your name